04/09/2026
🔑Work related deductions
Summary of recent cases:
The Hall case (2026) confirms that employees cannot claim home-office rent or car travel between home and work as deductions, while the Shaw case reframes the evidentiary order by requiring taxpayers to first establish that an expense is deductible in principle before substantiation rules apply. Together, they narrow the scope of work-related deductions and clarify the burden of proof.
🏠 Hall’s Case – Home Office Rent & Car Expenses
Case: Commissioner of Taxation v Hall [2026] FCAFC 43
Facts: Nathaniel Hall, an ABC sports presenter, worked partly from home (digital role) and partly at the studio (live role). He claimed:• Rent deduction: $5,878.87 (16.18% of apartment rent for a home office).
• Car expenses: 1,595 km of travel between home and studio.
Outcome: The Full Federal Court disallowed both deductions:• Home office rent: Occupancy expenses (like rent) are not deductible unless the home is a place of business. Hall’s apartment was not considered a business premise.
• Car travel: Travel between home and workplace is private in nature, even if part of the day’s duties are performed at home.
Implication: Employees working from home due to employer requirements or lockdowns cannot claim rent as a deduction unless their home is legally a business premise. Travel from home to work remains non-deductible.
📑 Shaw’s Case – Proof Before Substantiation
Case: Shaw v Commissioner of Taxation (recent Federal Court decision).
Key Principle: The Court clarified that substantiation rules (e.g., receipts, logbooks) only apply after a taxpayer has shown that an expense is deductible in principle under section 8‑1 ITAA 1997.
Effect:
• Taxpayers must first prove the nexus between expense and income production.
• Only then does the requirement to substantiate (provide records) arise.
Implication: This shifts the order of proof—taxpayers cannot rely on substantiation alone; they must establish deductibility before substantiation matters.
⚖️ Practical Takeaways for Taxpayers
• Home-office rent: Only deductible if the home is a place of business (e.g., doctor’s surgery, consulting office). A spare bedroom for employer-required remote work does not qualify.
• Car expenses: Travel between home and workplace is private, even if work duties are split between home and office.
• Burden of proof:
1. Show the expense is deductible in principle (work-related, not private).
2. Then substantiate with records.
🚨 Risks & Considerations
• Common misconception: Working from home ≠ automatic rent deduction.
• Audit risk: Claiming rent or commuting costs without meeting strict criteria may trigger ATO review.
• Best practice: Focus on allowable running expenses (electricity, internet, office supplies) rather than occupancy costs.
We can assist with any questions you may have regarding deductions and their validity ☎️ 9535 5900