03/03/2026
In a recent tax avoidance case the judge accepted that the had neither actual nor blind-eye knowledge that their returns were inaccurate. They argued that the test for a deliberate inaccuracy is subjective - a blind-eye knowledge “demands a specific and firmly grounded suspicion coupled with a deliberate decision not to investigate because of concern about what would be discovered”. The taxpayer had relied on professional advice throughout, referred to ’s opinion and their had been prepared by .
The First-tier Tribunal has allowed an appeal by Anthony and Ross Outram following an order by the Upper Tribunal ([2024] UKUT 00203 (TCC)) to set aside the original decision of the First-tier Tribunal ([2021] UKFTT 126 (TC)) dismissing their appeals. The Upper Tribunal remitted the appeal to the Fi...