08/04/2026
Is Loss prevention still having the wrong conversations?
I scroll through my feed and I still see the same debate playing out. CCTV placement, EAS tagging strategies, Manned guarding ratios... Don't get me wrong, these things matter. They have a place. I'm not dismissing them.
But if that's still the centre of gravity for your LP function in 2026, I'd argue you're optimising the wrong things.
Here's what I think the conversation should actually be about:
- Is your stock file accurate enough to trust?
- Do you know where your inventory actually is, or just where the system says it is?
- Are your shelves generating the sales they should be, or is phantom stock and poor availability quietly killing your basket size?
- Is your LP function helping customers find what they want, or just watching for people who take it?
The shift I've been pushing for years is this:
- Profit protection shouldn't just protect the bottom line. It should actively contribute to building it.
- File accuracy drives availability. Availability drives basket size. Basket size drives revenue.
That's not a Profit Protection outcome. That's a commercial one. And our function should own it.
The LP professionals I most respect aren't the ones who can quote shrinkage benchmarks. They're the ones who can sit in business meetings and talk about how their work moved the sales number.
Our function has to evolve or it risks becoming invisible to the businesses it serves.
Are we still defining ourselves by what we stop, rather than what we drive?
I'd genuinely like to hear where others are on this.