Dark Horse Wealth

Dark Horse Wealth DHW provides professional investment planning, investment consulting, financial planning, and invest

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence throughout the economy is anticipated to introduce transformative chang...
04/30/2026

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence throughout the economy is anticipated to introduce transformative changes, the full scope of which may not yet be widely comprehended.

In our early January investment letter, we explored emerging themes regarding global energy markets, national security, ...
03/27/2026

In our early January investment letter, we explored emerging themes regarding global energy markets, national security, and the shifting demand for hard assets in a multipolar economy. We are currently seeing many of these macro trends play out in real-time.

If you would like to read the full letter, or if you are interested in a comprehensive portfolio review, please visit our website to schedule a consultation. Not advice. Please consultant your investment professional.

Utilize Modern Portfolio Theory to build an asset allocation and manage risk. Seek to keep client fees reasonable and transparent.

Ask your advisor about Trump accounts for children. Not advise.  (also not political) For information ask your financial...
02/10/2026

Ask your advisor about Trump accounts for children. Not advise. (also not political) For information ask your financial professional.

12/07/2025

Chinas manufacturing sector already won. Game set match.

Their lack of regulations allows them to move at warp speed. This is a Gilded Age rate of change for industry and the world order.

Fun fact: The world will enjoy the fruits of cheap cars, if you want to call it that.

Not advice.

https://x.com/i/status/1997541581440639266

10/14/2025

I asked Ai about the reopening of mothballed mines during WW2 and here was the output.
US Mines Reopened During World War II
During World War II, the United States faced acute shortages of strategic metals essential for munitions, aircraft, ships, and other military hardware. To address this, the War Production Board (WPB) and War Manpower Commission mobilized the mining industry, prioritizing non-ferrous metals like copper, titanium, molybdenum, and tungsten over gold and silver, which were deemed non-essential. This led to the closure of nearly all gold mines via WPB Order L-208 in October 1942, redirecting labor and resources to strategic production. While most gold mines remained shuttered until the order's revocation in July 1945 (after V-E Day), several previously dormant or Depression-era closed mines were quickly reactivated or newly developed for critical minerals starting as early as 1940–1942. These reopenings were often subsidized by the federal government, involved rapid infrastructure builds (e.g., railroads), and employed thousands, with women entering above-ground roles in some cases by 1943.
Below is a table summarizing key examples of US mines that were quickly reopened or brought into production during the war. "Quickly" here refers to activations within 1–2 years of mobilization efforts, often amid labor shortages and with government incentives. These focused on metals like copper (for wiring and shells), titanium (for aircraft alloys and pigments), and molybdenum (for hardening steel).
Mine Name
Location
Mineral
Pre-War Status
Reopening/Activation Details
War Impact
Tahawus Mine (also known as McIntyre or Adirondac Mine)
Essex County, Adirondacks, New York
Titanium (ilmenite ore for TiO₂ pigment and alloys)
Abandoned since 1858 after iron mining; idle for ~83 years.
Purchased by National Lead Co. in 1941 with federal subsidies ($5–8 million); mining started in 1942 after rapid infrastructure build (railroad from North Creek, roads, power). Open-pit operation employed 400 by peak.
Supplied titanium for aircraft skins, paint (e.g., naval camouflage), and welding rods; reduced reliance on imports disrupted by U-boats. Produced ~86,000 tons/year by 1942; continued post-war until 1989.
Quincy Mine (part of Keweenaw Peninsula copper district)
Keweenaw County, Michigan
Copper
Closed during Great Depression (1930s); most district mines idle since ~1932.
Reopened in 1942 amid WPB prioritization; full district reactivation by 1943–1944 with government contracts. Employed steam shovels and open-pit methods scaled up for war.
Provided copper for electrical wiring, ammunition, and shipbuilding; Michigan output hit wartime peaks, supplying ~25% of US needs. District produced 267 million lbs in 1916 but surged again for WWII.
Calumet Mine (part of Keweenaw Peninsula copper district)
Houghton County, Michigan
Copper
Closed during Great Depression (1930s); consolidated under two companies, idle since ~1938.
Reopened alongside Quincy in 1942; rapid workforce mobilization via War Manpower Commission directives relocating gold miners.
Key for Allied wiring and electronics; helped offset global shortages, with peninsula mines fueling ~10–15% of US copper by war's end.
Climax Molybdenum Mine
Lake County, Colorado (near Leadville)
Molybdenum
Operational since 1918 but scaled back post-WWI; low output in 1930s due to weak demand.
Ramp-up began 1940–1941 as national priority; full mobilization by 1942 with underground expansion and company town (1,500 residents). Produced at WWII peaks by 1943.
Molybdenum hardened steel for tanks, guns, and armor; substituted for manganese (diverted to Germany via 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact). Supplied 75% of global output; employment >1,000.
Elizabeth Mine (South Strafford Copper Mine)
Strafford, Vermont
Copper
Intermittently active 1809–1918; closed since 1918 due to low grades and costs.
Reopened in 1943 by Vermont Copper Co. with $1M+ federal loan from Metals Reserve Co.; modern flotation mill (500 tons/day) built quickly. Supported by USGS/Bureau of Mines studies and Vermont WPB.
Supplied copper for wiring and shells; final 15-year run extracted chalcopyrite from pyrrhotite ore, aiding East Coast production amid transport risks.
Key Context and Broader Impacts
Mobilization Drivers: Pre-war surveys (1939–1941) identified domestic deposits to counter import risks (e.g., titanium from India/Canada). The WPB issued priorities for equipment/labor, and Directive No. 13 (1943) reassigned ~500–1,000 gold miners to these sites. Women filled ~500 above-ground jobs in Utah/Arizona copper by 1943, ending pre-war bans.
Challenges and Speed: Reopenings involved fast-tracked engineering (e.g., Tahawus railroad in

04/18/2025

We've consistently emphasized the importance of gold in a diversified portfolio, and we want to reiterate why. As we stated in our January letter:

"Geopolitical instability remains one of the most significant threats to market stability in 2025, with the potential to disrupt trade, supply chains, and investor confidence. Gold’s unique role as a safe-haven asset cannot be overstated in this environment. Its ability to preserve wealth during periods of inflation, economic uncertainty, and global turmoil makes it an indispensable part of a well-rounded portfolio. By balancing optimism with prudent risk management—including a strategic allocation to gold—investors can better weather the challenges posed by 2025’s complex and unpredictable landscape."

We believe this perspective remains crucial. Gold continues to offer a valuable hedge against uncertainty. #2025

Great chart. Comparison of G20 trade barriers by country.
03/14/2025

Great chart. Comparison of G20 trade barriers by country.

Trueflation falls to 1.3%, and there is the potential for peace in Ukraine (potential!), yet gold rises to a record $3,0...
03/14/2025

Trueflation falls to 1.3%, and there is the potential for peace in Ukraine (potential!), yet gold rises to a record $3,000. 400 metric tonnes of gold were moved to the US through January. I don't buy that the gold was moved due to tariffs. Tensions globally are escalating. This what gold is what the gold price is illustrating. Not advice.

02/05/2025

Gold is speaking

01/30/2025

2024 Market Review

While 2024 delivered strong positive performance for the US stock market, a closer look reveals a more nuanced picture. The S&P 500 captured headlines with a 25% return, but it's important to remember that this represents a narrow slice of the market – large-cap US stocks.

A broader perspective reveals a more mixed bag. The Russell 2000, often seen as a barometer of the US economy, returned a more modest 12.9%. International stocks lagged further behind, with the MSCI All Country World Index (ex-US) delivering just 5.5%.

For balanced investors, the Morningstar Moderate Risk Index (60% stocks) returned 8.6%, while the Moderately Aggressive Index returned 10.7%. These indices likely capture the risk profile of most working-age adults.

Fixed income also faced headwinds, with the US Aggregate Bond Index yielding a mere 1.3% due to rising interest rates.

This variance in asset class returns highlights the importance of diversification and a thoughtful approach to portfolio construction. In this letter, we will explore the key market trends of 2024 and discuss how we are positioning portfolios for the year ahead.

Market Outlook for 2025: Momentum with Caution Amid Geopolitical Risks

President-elect Donald Trump campaigned on a platform of lower taxes and less-stringent regulations—seen as growth-positive—but also higher tariffs on imported goods and mass deportations of illegal immigrants—seen generally as stagflationary, at least initially (stagflation is a situation with high inflation, low economic growth and high unemployment). These crosscurrents and the uncertainties they are breeding make it difficult for stakeholders (both domestic and international) to plan for the future, potentially creating an environment of caution and concern across policy areas. Add to this a Federal Reserve operating in data-dependency mode, and we have a backdrop of reactionary market behavior and policy decisions.

The good news is that the past two decades have brought more sustainable and resilient growth in the domestic economy, and more self-sufficiency in terms of food and energy production, lessening the reliance on trade. This has led to higher returns on U.S. capital and in turn ample capital inflows alongside a strong U.S. dollar.

But there are other uncertainty wrinkles looking ahead, a key one being immigration policy. Regardless of your view about our immigration problem and appropriate solutions, unquestionably, slower immigration coupled with mass deportations will lead to a downshift in labor force growth and labor supply—also likely denting the economic demand side of that equation.

For now, the labor market remains healthy. The rise in the unemployment rate from 3.4% at the start of 2023 to its current 4.2% was largely a function of a significant increase in the labor force due to immigration—not due to layoffs. Assuming immigration falls and deportations pick up along side a slowing in the labor force, the downward pressure on wage growth could reverse. That, plus a lower sustainable rate of payroll growth could put the Federal Reserve in a bit of a pickle trying to adjust policy to that downshift, especially if inflation heats up.

On the pro-growth side of the ledger are tax-related proposals (including the extension of 2017's tax cuts and the possibility of a further corporate tax cut). That's in addition to pro-growth deregulation policies being proposed. There may be a timing issue given policies around tariffs and immigration can largely be done via executive order, while tax changes require congressional approval.

Transitioning to the stock market, we think overall that equities can do well from point A (the beginning of the year) to point B (the end of the year). However, the volatility backdrop is likely to be different from what investors got used to in 2024. This past year was defined by incredible sub-surface churn with minimal relative scarring at the index level: The maximum drawdown for the S&P 500 was -8.5%; the average member's maximum drawdown was -20%. The likelihood of a similar dynamic in 2025 is low, in our opinion.

One of the reasons for a step back in performance after such a strong year might be tied to valuation. Based on a five-year normalized price-to-earnings ratio,1 the S&P 500 is looking quite stretched, and in fact has only been more expensive in the late 1990s and 2021—of course, periods which preceded weakness in the market. However, we tend to view valuation as more an indicator of sentiment, and we believe the stretched valuation environment is a product of enthusiasm around equities, not necessarily in and of itself a risk to the market's near-term performance.

We continue to recommend staying up in quality, looking for stocks of companies with factors like improving profit, balance-sheet strength, ample interest coverage ratios (which measure a company's ability to pay interest on its debt) and healthy free cash flow.

Cautious Optimism in a Shifting and Uncertain Landscape
Consumer, business, and investor confidence surged following the 2024 election. Donald Trump’s second term is expected to bring new tax and tariff policies, creating potential economic friction. To put this optimism in context, according to Bank of American’s Fund Manger survey cash allocations fell to a RECORD low with equity allocation nearing 40%! In fact, not even 2001 or 2008 saw equity allocation at these levels. Such aggressive positioning should and has led to a near correction could continue throughout the early part of the year.

Additionally, geopolitical instability—ranging from global conflicts to trade disputes and rising tensions in key regions—could derail economic momentum. Equity investors and the Federal Reserve face little room for error, particularly if inflation rises and monetary policy options narrow.

Economic Growth to Continue, but at a Moderated Pace
The economy is expected to grow for a fifth consecutive year, fueled by a resilient consumer, steady job creation, fiscal spending through programs like the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPs Act, and investments in transformative sectors such as artificial intelligence. However, the pace of growth may moderate, particularly if geopolitical events disrupt global trade or supply chains.

Dialing Back Equity Market Expectations Amid Geopolitical Tensions
Following two consecutive years of over 20% gains for the S&P 500, tempered expectations are prudent. While market fundamentals remain solid—strong economic growth, positive earnings, and corporate activity—high valuations, potential complacency, and geopolitical risks could limit returns. Indeed Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase said, “World War III has already begun. You already have battles on the ground being coordinated in multiple countries,” at a event in Washington, DC on Oct. 24. A statement such as this from Dimon should not be taken lightly. With global instability threatening investor confidence, gold offers a stabilizing force, particularly in volatile equity markets.

Mid-Cap Stocks to Shine Despite External Risks
Mid-cap stocks, with their balanced exposure and predominantly domestic revenue focus, may outperform in 2025. They are anticipated to deliver 13% earnings growth, supported by attractive valuations. Their relative insulation from international trade disruptions or sanctions further enhances their appeal. Nonetheless, geopolitical events can ripple through all asset classes, making gold a valuable hedge even for mid-cap investors.

Key Sectors to Watch in an Unpredictable World
Investors should focus on technology, industrials, and health care, which align with long-term macro trends:

Technology: Innovation in AI and sustained corporate investment.

Energy: Dirty energy, coal and natural gas, may become back in vogue as governments look to solutions for energy shortages caused by the EV and AI revolutions. Pipeline stocks, which act as toll collector, seem particularly well positioned and offer the safey of dividends that range from 4% to 8%.

Industrials: Benefits from government spending, reshoring, AI-driven transformation, and infrastructure development.

Health Care: Attractive valuations and growing demand from demographic shifts.

While these sectors present opportunities, they are not immune to global instability.

Potential Black Swan - Debt Crisis
Rising interest costs on the federal debt have become a key concern as rates remain elevated. The Congressional Budget Office projects interest payments to approach $1.0 trillion in 2025. For context the DoD budget is $850 billion. Interest on debt fast becoming one the biggest expenses to the US Government. Compounding this challenge, a significant portion of U.S. Treasury debt—estimated at over $7 trillion—is set to mature in 2025. This necessitates substantial refinancing at prevailing rates, potentially amplifying debt-servicing costs and contributing to volatility in bond markets.

The Case for Hedging with Gold Amid Geopolitical Uncertainty
Geopolitical instability remains one of the most significant threats to market stability in 2025, with the potential to disrupt trade, supply chains, and investor confidence. Gold’s unique role as a safe-haven asset cannot be overstated in this environment. Its ability to preserve wealth during periods of inflation, economic uncertainty, and global turmoil makes it an indispensable part of a well-rounded portfolio.

By balancing optimism with prudent risk management—including a strategic allocation to gold—investors can better weather the challenges posed by 2025’s complex and unpredictable landscape.

Address

51 Albany Street
Cazenovia, NY
13035

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 4pm
Wednesday 9am - 4pm
Thursday 9am - 4pm
Friday 9am - 4pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dark Horse Wealth posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Dark Horse Wealth:

Share