William McClanahan CFP, Consolidated Planning

William McClanahan CFP, Consolidated Planning I specialize in helping my clients create holistic financial plans through accessibility. PAS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Guardian.

Registered Representative and Financial Advisor of Park Avenue Securities LLC (PAS). Securities products and advisory services offered through PAS, member FINRA, SIPC. Financial Representative of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America® (Guardian), New York, NY. Consolidated Planning, Inc. is not an affiliate or subsidiary of PAS or Guardian. CA Insurance License Number - 4220969. This mate

rial is intended for general use. By providing this content The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Park Avenue Securities LLC, affiliates and/or subsidiaries, and your financial representative are not undertaking to provide advice or make a recommendation for a specific individual or situation, or to otherwise act in a fiduciary capacity. Guardian, its subsidiaries, agents and employees do not provide tax, legal, or accounting advice. Consult your tax, legal, or accounting professional regarding your individual situation. Links to external sites are provided for your convenience in locating related information and services. Guardian, its subsidiaries, agents and employees expressly disclaim any responsibility for and do not maintain, control, recommend, or endorse third-party sites, organizations, products, or services and make no representation as to the completeness, suitability, or quality thereof.
/COMPLIANCE:2022-5844/

07/21/2026

I see this pattern constantly, so let me walk you through how it usually plays out.

Twenty minutes into a meeting, one spouse asks about Roth conversions. The other wants to know about mortgage payoff strategy. Both smart questions. Wrong order.

I stop them.

"Before we decide between those two, I need to understand something. Between now and retirement, what's the biggest threat to your plan? Not whether you save enough, you've handled that. I mean what would actually derail things."

One of them usually says something like: "If something happened to my income before we both hit 50. We're still ten years out."

The other: "If there's a huge market drop right when we go to retire."

"And if you had to pick one thing that would let you sleep at night knowing you could handle those scenarios?"

Almost every time, they say the same thing at the same time: "Enough liquid money."

"Okay. So before we talk about Roth conversions or mortgage strategy, we need to make sure you're protected against those two risks. Enough life insurance to cover the income gap. Enough true liquidity to survive a bear market without taking portfolio withdrawals when the market's down. Once we've built that floor, then we talk tactics."

One of them leans back. "So the mortgage payoff strategy depends on knowing we're protected."

"Exactly. The order matters. Protection first. Then cash flow. Then the math around which tactic makes sense."

"No one's ever explained it that way before."

The rest of the meeting looks completely different after that. Every question gets filtered through the same lens: does this protect the floor, or does this optimize what's on top of the floor?

That's the question most retirement plans skip.

07/16/2026

Michael and Lisa came in with a specific number for retirement: $2.5 million. I asked them to
put the number away for a minute.

"That number," I said, "came from an online calculator or something you read. Let me ask you
something different. If we're sitting here in three years and I ask what you've accomplished,
what would make you feel like we got this right?"

Michael didn't answer right away.

"I don't know. Like we're not stressed about money?"

"What does that look like specifically?" I asked.

Lisa jumped in. "Not checking our balance before we take a vacation. That's the thing that
stresses me out. We have enough, but we're always watching."

"What would need to happen for you to just... book a trip?"

"Knowing that our regular life is covered. That we're not touching retirement money for stuff
that happens next Tuesday."

Michael nodded. "And knowing our kids' education is handled. That one keeps both of us up."

For the next 20 minutes, we weren't talking about the $2.5 million anymore. We were talking
about a life where they could take a spontaneous trip without anxiety. Where they weren't
funding their kids' college from current income. Where the baseline expenses were covered
by money that wasn't from their portfolio.

Three specific things. None of which were actually about reaching $2.5 million.

At the end, I pulled up the number again.

"Knowing what you just told me, let me show you what it might actually take."

The number was smaller than they thought. Because the real question was never the number.
The real question was what had to be true in their life for them to stop worrying.

Michael looked at Lisa. "Why didn't anyone ask us this first?"

07/14/2026

Michael and Lisa's save rate didn't change for two years.

I'd shown them the math. They'd nodded. Said they'd try it. Then nothing happened.

Then, about six months ago, Lisa's company gave her a $30K bonus. Michael got a $12K
raise.

This time, instead of letting it hit checking, they diverted it.

I asked them about it last week.

"We almost spent it," Michael said. "There was this moment, maybe a week in, where we
just... didn't think about it."

"Like it wasn't there," Lisa added.

"Exactly. Out of sight, out of mind, but in a good way."

I pulled up their savings numbers. In the last six months, they'd built $52K in additional assets
they wouldn't have built before. Not because they made more money. Because new money
went somewhere that required a decision to spend it, instead of somewhere that required a
decision to save it.

Lisa was quiet for a second. "So we didn't change our life. We just changed where the new
money goes."

"And your savings rate went from about 8% to 22%."

"In six months."

"Without touching your lifestyle. Without sacrifice. Without forcing anything."

Michael leaned back. "Why doesn't everyone do this?"

It's the right question. And I still don't have a good answer.

07/09/2026

Michael got a $10K raise. Three months later, I'd have never known he got a raise.

Michael's a pharmacist. Lisa works in marketing at a tech company. Combined they make
nearly $400K. Three kids. Nice house. Good life.

But something wasn't working.

"We save a little," Lisa had told me, "but not as much as we should with our income."

I asked them to walk me through what happens when Michael's raise hits.

Michael: "It goes into checking like everything else."

"Does it stay there?"

"Not really. By the time the month ends, it's just... spent. We don't really talk about it."

Lisa nodded. "We pay the bills. We live. The money disappears."

This is the most common pattern I see. Income goes up, lifestyle rises at exactly the same
speed. A $10K raise becomes $10K in additional spending. A $25K bonus becomes a $25K
month. The gap never widens. The savings rate stays flat.

I asked them if they'd be willing to try something different.

"What if every dollar that comes in—bonuses, raises, all of it went somewhere else first?
Somewhere that interrupted that automatic spending pattern?"

Michael looked skeptical. "We'd need rules for that."

"One rule," I said. "All income deposits to a different account first. Only the amount you've
decided to spend gets transferred to checking. Everything else just sits."

"So the raise..."

"Sits. By default. Until you decide to spend it."

Lisa and Michael looked at each other.

"That's the opposite of what we do now," Lisa said.

"Exactly.

07/07/2026

Jennifer showed me their liquid reserves. $150K in a brokerage account.

I asked one question: "What happened to that in March 2020?"

She didn't answer right away.

Jennifer's a pharmacy manager. David develops commercial real estate. Combined they make $430K. They've been disciplined about saving. That $150K represents actual restraint.

But it's sitting in a stock-heavy brokerage account.

"When would you actually need this money?" I asked Jennifer.

"If something came up. An emergency. Job loss. Something unexpected in our life where we had to pull it out."

I pulled up their account history. March 2020. That $150K dropped to about $95K.

She stared at the screen.

"So the year something actually happens in your life, that money's down 37%," I said.

David leaned forward. "We need this money to be cash. Not in the market."

"Exactly. When life happens, you can't wait for markets to recover. You need money that doesn't move. Several years of what you'd actually need to pull out."

They looked at their number and realized it was bigger than they thought.

But that number mattered for a different reason now.

07/02/2026

I see this exact gap almost every quarter, so let me walk you through how it usually plays out.

Picture a pharmacist and a CFO. Combined income north of $350K. The kind of couple who feels like retirement is handled.

We're running through Retirement Readiness and I ask about Social Security. They pull up the estimate. They look settled about it.

Then I ask: "How much of your lifestyle cost does that cover?"

They do the math themselves. Their number is around $220K a year to live how they want.

Social Security covers about 14% of that.

For the next 20 minutes we map out where the other $190K comes from. Retirement accounts. Brokerage investments. Portfolio withdrawals. All variable.

Then it clicks for one of them: "So if the market drops 40% the year I retire, I'm pulling money out of things that are down 40%."

"That's the risk we're designing around right now," I say.

That's the moment high earners usually don't see coming. Not whether they'll have enough saved. Whether the income is actually guaranteed.

06/30/2026

They had the same income. Completely different retirements.

Two couples. Same profession. Roughly the same earnings over the same number of years. Both came to me within 18 months of each other, both in their early 60s, both planning to retire soon.

One retired on schedule. The other has pushed their date back three times.

The difference wasn't performance. It wasn't savings rate. It wasn't even luck.

It was structure.

Couple one had their assets arranged around a clear question: "What does this money need to do for us every month, for the rest of our lives?"

Their guaranteed income — between Social Security, a small pension, and an annuity they'd purchased years earlier — covered their essential expenses completely. Their portfolio wasn't on the hook for survival. It was there for growth, for the extras, for legacy.

They retired in October. By December they'd already booked two international trips.

Couple two had the same raw numbers. But everything was in one place — a collection of investment accounts they'd been told to "diversify" over the years. When the time came to actually turn the accounts into income, there was no floor. Every expense depended on the market cooperating.

The first year they planned to retire, the market dropped 18%.
They waited.
The next year, inflation spiked.
They waited again.
They're still waiting.

Same income. Different structure. Completely different outcomes.

Retirement readiness isn't just about the number in the account. It's about whether that number is arranged in a way that actually works when you stop earning.

If you're not sure which category your current plan puts you in, that's worth knowing sooner rather than later.

06/25/2026

The tax you pay in retirement is mostly a choice — if you plan for it early enough.

Most high-income professionals assume their tax rate drops when they stop working.

For dual-income households, that's often not true.

Here's why:

1. Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs). All those pre-tax 401(k) contributions? They become taxable income when you turn 73. At the scale most dual-income professionals accumulate, RMDs alone can push you into a higher bracket than you expected.

2. Social Security taxation. Up to 85% of your Social Security benefit becomes taxable once combined income crosses a threshold. For most high earners, that threshold gets crossed immediately.

3. Long-term capital gains stacking. If your taxable brokerage account is also producing income or you're selling positions, that income stacks on top of everything else.

The result: a couple who earned $350k in their working years retires expecting a lower tax bill and ends up with a similar or higher effective rate.

The solution isn't complicated, but it requires planning before you retire — not after:

Roth conversions during lower-income years.
Tax-efficient withdrawal sequencing (which accounts you pull from and in what order).
Using vehicles like life insurance or non-qualified annuities for their tax treatment.
Strategic charitable giving to offset income.

Retirement tax strategy isn't about loopholes. It's about structure. The earlier you build it, the more options you have.

If this is a blind spot in your current plan, it's a good time to look at it.

06/23/2026

Her financial plan was technically correct. It just wasn't built for her actual life.

Specialist physician. Mid-50s. Two kids finishing college. Mortgage nearly paid off. Strong income, solid savings rate.

Her existing plan projected she'd retire comfortably at 62.

It was a good plan by any standard metric.

But when we sat down and actually talked about retirement — not the numbers, but what she wanted retirement to look like — the plan started to show its cracks.

She didn't want to stop at 62. She wanted to scale back at 55.
She wanted to travel internationally with her husband every year, not just occasionally.
She had a parent in declining health who might need financial support.
She wanted to give meaningfully to her church and to a scholarship fund she'd been thinking about for years.

None of those things were catastrophically expensive. But none of them were in the plan either.

The spreadsheet showed a retirement. The conversation revealed a life.

When we rebuilt around what actually mattered to her — the travel, the flexibility, the giving, the safety net for her parent — the strategy looked different. Not worse. Just real.

If your plan feels technically sound but doesn't quite account for your actual life, that gap is worth a conversation.

06/18/2026

True liquidity in retirement isn't what most people think it is.

Your 401(k) is not liquid.
Your brokerage account is not truly liquid either — not if it's your only income source.

Here's the distinction that changes everything:

True liquidity is money that has no job right now.
It's not generating your income. It's not tied to a timeline. It's not being counted on for anything.

It just sits there — accessible, stable, ready.

Most people entering retirement have "liquid" assets in the technical sense — they can sell investments and get cash. But if those same assets are also the source of your monthly income, they aren't truly liquid. Selling them when they're down isn't a choice. It's an obligation.

Real liquidity in a retirement structure is a separate bucket:
Emergency access. Opportunity capital. A psychological anchor.

Having genuine liquidity does something important beyond the practical: it lets you make smarter, less emotional decisions with every other dollar.

When you're not desperate for your portfolio to cooperate, you can be patient.
When you're not one bad year away from a lifestyle change, you think more clearly.

It sounds simple. Most plans skip it entirely.

Address

6115 Park S Drive Suite 200
Charlotte, NC
28210

Telephone

+16173069952

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when William McClanahan CFP, Consolidated Planning posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category