Dino Tax Co

Directions Website Contact the business

Dino Tax Co 🦖 Dino Tax Co: We crunch numbers like a T. rex crunches bones. We think dinosaurs and taxes are the perfect pairing of funny and serious.

From Brontosaurus-sized refunds to Velociraptor-speed service, our herd makes tax season a Jurassic breeze. While we’re absolutely serious about getting your taxes done right and saving you money, we want to break the ice in a humorous and approachable way. Our hope is that a dinosaur-themed tax company is striking enough that you won’t forget us. Our tax services include:
- Income Tax Preparation
- Previous Year(s) Unfiled Returns
- Settling IRS Debt or Payment Plans
- General Tax Consulting

Are Political Contributions Tax Deductible? What the IRS Says About Campaign Donations, Fundraisers, and Political Event...
09/09/2026

Are Political Contributions Tax Deductible? What the IRS Says About Campaign Donations, Fundraisers, and Political Events

Election season brings campaign advertisements, fundraising emails, political dinners, candidate events, and requests for donations.

That can also produce a tax question:

Are political contributions tax deductible?

For federal income tax purposes, the general answer is no.

Giving money to a candidate or political organization ordinarily does not create a charitable contribution deduction. And business owners generally cannot transform a political contribution into a business expense merely because supporting a candidate might be good for business.

Federal tax law goes even further. Special rules can deny deductions for expenditures involving political dinners, fundraisers, advertisements, and certain inaugural events.

Here is how the rules work.

Political Campaign Contributions Are Generally Not Tax Deductible

A political contribution should not be confused with a charitable contribution.

IRS Publication 526 identifies political organizations and candidates for public office among the recipients to whom payments are not deductible as charitable contributions. (IRS)

That means an individual generally cannot contribute $500 to a congressional candidate and then claim the $500 as a charitable contribution on Schedule A.

The rule isn't changed simply because the taxpayer strongly believes the candidate's election would benefit the country, the community, or the taxpayer's business.

Political activity and charitable giving occupy different categories under federal tax law.

What If My Business Makes the Political Contribution?

This raises a slightly different question.

Suppose a business owner contributes money to a candidate who supports policies favorable to the owner's industry. Could the owner characterize the payment as an ordinary and necessary business expense?

Generally, no.

IRC § 162(e) expressly denies the business-expense deduction for specified lobbying and political expenditures. Among the prohibited categories are amounts connected with participating or intervening in a political campaign for or against a candidate for public office. The IRS likewise describes political campaign expenditures and attempts to influence the general public concerning elections as nondeductible political expenditures. (IRS)

Treasury Regulation § 1.162-20 is similarly direct. It provides that expenditures:

“for political campaign purposes (including the support of or opposition to any candidate for public office)”

are not deductible from gross income under the rule described in the regulation. (Legal Information Institute)

So putting the contribution on the business credit card does not magically turn politics into advertising.

What About Buying a Ticket to a Political Fundraising Dinner?

Here the regulations become unusually specific.

Imagine that instead of simply donating $500 to a candidate, you pay $500 to attend the candidate's fundraising dinner.

You receive dinner in return. Perhaps you meet potential clients. Maybe you even discuss business during the event.

Can you deduct some or all of the ticket as a business expense?

Treasury Regulation § 1.276-1(d) says:

“No deduction shall be allowed for an expenditure for admission to any dinner or program”

when any part of the proceeds directly or indirectly benefits, or is intended to benefit, a political party or political candidate. (Legal Information Institute)

And Congress and the Treasury did not leave much room for clever arguments about what constitutes a “dinner or program.”

The regulation says the term includes a:

“gala, dance, ball, theatrical or film presentation, cocktail or other party, picnic, barbecue, sporting event”

and continues to cover numerous other events, including brunches, auctions, speeches, lectures, fashion shows, concerts, meetings, and similar gatherings. (Legal Information Institute)

Yes, the Treasury regulations specifically contemplate the tax consequences of a political barbecue. 😂

A Political Fundraiser Does Not Become Deductible Because You Network There

This distinction can matter to business owners.

Ordinary business networking expenses may sometimes qualify for tax treatment under the normal business-expense rules. But attaching networking opportunities to a political fundraiser does not necessarily overcome the specific statutory restrictions on political expenditures.

Treasury Regulation § 1.276-1 even gives an example involving a taxpayer engaged in business who buys tickets to a fundraising event for a political candidate. The regulation concludes that the expenditures are nondeductible—even where the candidate later gives the fundraiser's proceeds to charity. (Legal Information Institute)

The tax character of the expenditure therefore cannot necessarily be changed by pointing to some secondary business or charitable benefit.

Can I Deduct an Advertisement Supporting a Political Candidate?

Businesses should also be careful with political advertising.

Treasury Regulation § 1.276-1(c) provides:

“No deduction shall be allowed for an expenditure for advertising”

in covered publications when proceeds directly or indirectly benefit, or are intended to benefit, a political party or candidate. (Legal Information Institute)

The regulation's definition of a publication is remarkably broad. It includes such things as magazines, brochures, newsletters, newspapers, billboards, signs, programs, and radio or television announcements.

There is therefore an important distinction between ordinary commercial advertising and spending that financially supports political activity.

Calling something “advertising” on the company's books does not by itself establish that the expenditure is deductible.

What About Inaugural Balls and Other Inaugural Events?

Federal tax regulations address those too.

Treasury Regulation § 1.276-1(e) states:

“No deduction shall be allowed for an expenditure for admission to an inaugural ball, inaugural gala, inaugural parade, or inaugural concert”

or a similar event connected with someone's inauguration or installation in office when the event is identified with a political party or political candidate. (Legal Information Institute)

Interestingly, the regulation explains that the sponsorship of the event and ultimate use of the proceeds are generally irrelevant for purposes of this particular rule, except insofar as those facts help identify the event with a political party or candidate. (Legal Information Institute)

So even an inaugural event that does not look like an ordinary campaign contribution can present a deduction problem.

What If the Candidate Gives the Money to Charity?

This is another tempting argument.

Suppose a taxpayer buys tickets to a political fundraiser. The candidate subsequently announces that all of the proceeds will be donated to charity.

Does that convert the taxpayer's payment into a charitable contribution?

The regulations provide an example saying no.

Treasury Regulation § 1.276-1 describes a business taxpayer purchasing tickets to a candidate's fundraising affair and expressly states that the expenditures remain nondeductible even though the candidate donates the proceeds to a charitable organization. (Legal Information Institute)

That makes sense structurally. The taxpayer paid the political fundraiser. The taxpayer did not make a contribution directly to the charity merely because someone downstream eventually transferred the money to one.

Political Contributions Are Different From Donations to a Church or Charity

This distinction becomes especially important because legitimate charitable contributions can qualify for federal tax deductions.

IRS Publication 526 lists organizations such as churches, nonprofit schools and hospitals, and certain other qualified organizations as potential recipients of deductible charitable contributions. The same IRS publication separately identifies political organizations and candidates as nondeductible recipients. (IRS)

And beginning with tax year 2026, federal law once again permits qualifying non-itemizers to deduct a limited amount of certain cash charitable contributions—generally up to $1,000 for an individual or $2,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly. That new deduction does not turn political campaign donations into charitable contributions. (IRS)

The identity and tax status of the recipient still matter.

Can a 501(c)(3) Charity Give Money to a Candidate?

Generally, no—and this involves an additional set of rules governing the charity itself.

The IRS explains that organizations exempt under IRC § 501(c)(3) are prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of—or in opposition to—any candidate for elective public office.

For churches, charities, and other tax-exempt organizations, the line between permissible public advocacy and prohibited campaign intervention can be extremely important. Understanding where that line falls can help an organization remain engaged in issues of public concern without jeopardizing its federal tax-exempt status.

Do You Owe Taxes If You Get Paid in Free Stuff? How the IRS Taxes Products, Meals, Trips, and Other Noncash Compensation...
09/07/2026

Do You Owe Taxes If You Get Paid in Free Stuff? How the IRS Taxes Products, Meals, Trips, and Other Noncash Compensation

Getting paid does not always mean receiving a paycheck.

Maybe you repair someone's car and they give you a television in return. Perhaps a business gives you merchandise in exchange for your work. Maybe a client pays part of your fee with property. Or perhaps someone offers you a free vacation, meals, or another valuable benefit in exchange for performing services.

It can be tempting to think that no money changing hands means there is nothing to report on a tax return.

Unfortunately, federal income tax law generally does not work that way.

The Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations broadly define income to include property and services—not merely cash. In many situations, if you perform services and receive something valuable in return, the fair market value of what you receive is taxable income.

The Tax Code Does Not Care Whether You Were Paid in Cash

The starting point is Internal Revenue Code § 61, which generally defines gross income as "all income from whatever source derived," including compensation for services.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-1(a) makes the breadth of that rule particularly clear:

“Gross income includes income realized in any form, whether in money, property, or services.”

The regulation continues by explaining that income can take the form of services, meals, accommodations, stock, other property, or cash. (Legal Information Institute)

That means changing the form in which you are compensated ordinarily does not make the compensation disappear for tax purposes.

If someone owes you $1,000 for your work and pays you $1,000 in cash, the tax consequences are relatively obvious.

But receiving $1,000 worth of property for the same work generally does not transform taxable compensation into a tax-free gift.

What If Someone Gives You Property for Your Services?

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2(d)(1) addresses this situation directly.

The regulation provides:

“if services are paid for in property, the fair market value of the property taken in payment must be included in income as compensation.”

It similarly provides that when services are exchanged for other services, the fair market value of the services received generally must be included as compensation. (Legal Information Institute)

This is an important rule because many taxpayers intuitively associate taxable income with money deposited into a bank account.

The federal tax system is considerably broader.

Example: Getting a Laptop Instead of Cash

Suppose Maria performs $1,500 of graphic-design work for a local business.

Instead of paying Maria $1,500 in cash, the business gives her a new computer with a fair market value of $1,500.

Assuming no special exclusion applies, Maria generally has $1,500 of compensation income.

She did not receive cash.

That does not mean she received nothing of economic value.

What If You Trade Services?

The same basic principle applies to services exchanged for other services.

Imagine that a tax preparer prepares a plumber's tax return, while the plumber performs plumbing work at the tax preparer's office.

Nobody writes a check.

That does not necessarily mean nobody has income.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2(d)(1) specifically says that when services are paid for through other services, the fair market value of the services received must generally be included in income as compensation. (Legal Information Institute)

The tax system therefore looks to the economic substance of the transaction rather than merely asking whether dollars changed hands.

What Is Fair Market Value?

This leads to the practical question: How much income do you report?

Generally, the relevant amount is the fair market value of the property or services received.

The regulation also contains a useful valuation presumption. When services are performed at a stipulated price, that price is presumed to represent the fair market value of the compensation received unless there is evidence to the contrary. (Legal Information Institute)

Suppose, for example, that you normally charge $800 for a particular job.

A customer agrees to give you equipment instead of paying the $800 bill.

The agreed-upon price can become important evidence of the value of what you received.

What If You Buy Property From Your Employer for Almost Nothing?

Another less obvious rule arises when property is transferred to an employee or independent contractor for less than its fair market value as compensation for services.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2(d)(2)(i) generally provides that the difference between the amount paid and the property's fair market value is compensation when an employer transfers property to an employee, or property is transferred to an independent contractor, as compensation for services. (Legal Information Institute)

Consider an employee who is allowed to purchase a $5,000 piece of property from an employer for $500 specifically as compensation for work performed.

Calling the transaction a "sale" does not necessarily mean the other $4,500 disappears for federal tax purposes.

Special rules and exclusions can apply, particularly to various employee fringe benefits and transfers governed by other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. But the basic principle is important: compensation can be disguised by the form of a transaction without ceasing to be compensation.

But What About an Actual Gift?

This is where the facts become extremely important.

Not every valuable thing you receive is compensation.

IRC § 102 generally excludes qualifying gifts from the recipient's gross income. But simply calling something a "gift" does not necessarily establish that it is one for federal tax purposes.

If your grandmother gives you a television for your birthday, that presents a very different tax question from a client giving you the same television because you performed $1,000 of work.

The surrounding relationship and reason for the transfer matter.

The regulations themselves recognize that gifts receive special treatment under § 102. (Legal Information Institute)

The question therefore is not simply:

Did I receive something for free?

A better question is:

Why did I receive it?

What About Free Meals, Hotel Rooms, Trips, and Similar Benefits?

These situations can become more complicated because the Internal Revenue Code contains numerous specific exclusions.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-1 establishes the general rule that income can be realized as meals, accommodations, property, services, stock, or cash. But that regulation also recognizes that another Code provision may specifically exclude or specially treat an item that would otherwise fall within the broad definition of gross income. (Legal Information Institute)

For example, federal tax law contains specialized rules governing certain employer-provided meals and lodging, employee discounts, working-condition fringe benefits, de minimis benefits, transportation benefits, and other arrangements.

Accordingly, receiving something valuable does not automatically mean it is taxable.

Rather, the analysis usually works in this order:

1. Did the taxpayer receive an economic benefit?

2. Was the benefit compensation for services or otherwise within gross income?

3. If so, does a specific provision of the Internal Revenue Code exclude it?

That third question can completely change the result.

"Free" Can Be a Misleading Word

This is particularly important in the modern economy.

Businesses routinely compensate people with merchandise, travel, credits, memberships, services, discounts, meals, and other noncash benefits.

From an ordinary consumer's perspective, something may feel "free."

From a tax perspective, however, the important question may be whether the taxpayer received the benefit because the taxpayer provided something in return.

A $2,000 vacation given to you out of detached generosity presents one issue.

A $2,000 vacation provided as payment for $2,000 worth of consulting services presents another.

The second transaction cannot ordinarily escape taxation merely because the compensation arrived as an airline ticket and hotel room rather than a check.

The IRS's Definition of Income Is Intentionally Broad

This entire subject illustrates one of the most important principles in federal income taxation.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-1 does not limit income to dollars. It expressly recognizes income received as property or services, and even gives meals, accommodations, and stock as examples. (Legal Information Institute)

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2 then applies that principle specifically to compensation, requiring the fair market value of property or services received as payment for services to be included in income, subject to applicable exceptions. (Legal Information Institute)

In other words:

If you earned it, changing what you were paid with generally does not change the fact that you were paid.

The Bottom Line

Receiving property, services, meals, travel, or other valuable benefits instead of cash does not automatically make compensation tax-free.

Under IRC § 61 and the Treasury Regulations, compensation can generally be received in money, property, or services. When someone pays for your services with property or other services, the fair market value of what you receive generally must be included in income unless another provision of federal tax law provides an exclusion.

So if someone tells you:

"Don't worry—it's not taxable because they're paying you in free stuff."

That should probably lead to another question:

Free stuff—or stuff you earned?

For federal income tax purposes, the difference can matter quite a bit.

This article provides general educational information about federal tax law and is not individualized tax, legal, or accounting advice. Tax treatment depends on the facts and circumstances of each transaction.

Is NIL Money Taxable? How College Athletes Are Taxed on Name, Image, and Likeness IncomeCollege athletes can now make mo...
09/04/2026

Is NIL Money Taxable? How College Athletes Are Taxed on Name, Image, and Likeness Income

College athletes can now make money from endorsements, social media promotions, autograph signings, appearances, sponsorships, merchandise, and other uses of their name, image, and likeness.

Some athletes may receive thousands or even millions of dollars. Others may receive considerably smaller amounts—or may be compensated with free merchandise, meals, services, gift cards, or other benefits rather than cash.

That raises an important tax question:

Is NIL income taxable?

In most cases, yes.

The federal income tax system generally does not care whether compensation arrives as a paycheck, a direct deposit, a pair of shoes, free services, or some other valuable property. If an athlete receives something of value in exchange for performing services or allowing commercial use of his or her name, image, or likeness, the transaction can create taxable income.

And depending upon the circumstances, an athlete may be operating a trade or business and may owe self-employment tax in addition to federal income tax.

What Is NIL Income?

“NIL” stands for name, image, and likeness.

College athletes may receive compensation from businesses, collectives, sponsors, or other parties for activities such as:

• appearing in advertisements;

• promoting products on social media;

• signing autographs;

• making personal appearances;

• licensing photographs or other likenesses;

• endorsing businesses or products;

• participating in promotional events; or

• creating sponsored online content.

The IRS expressly recognizes NIL activities as potential sources of taxable income.

An important point is that NIL income is not automatically tax-free merely because the recipient is a student or student-athlete.

Scholarships have their own tax rules. Compensation for commercial services is a different matter.

The Starting Point: Compensation Is Generally Taxable

Internal Revenue Code § 61 establishes the broad federal definition of gross income.

Section 61(a) generally defines gross income as “all income from whatever source derived” unless another provision of federal tax law provides an exclusion.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2 applies that principle specifically to compensation for services.

The regulation states:

“Wages, salaries, commissions paid salesmen, compensation for services” are income to the recipients unless excluded by law.

That principle reaches far beyond traditional wages.

A college athlete does not necessarily need to receive an ordinary paycheck for an NIL arrangement to produce taxable income.

For example, suppose a local car dealership pays a college football player $5,000 to appear in advertisements and make several promotional social-media posts.

The fact that the athlete is a student does not convert the $5,000 into a scholarship or a tax-free gift. The payment was made in exchange for something—the athlete's promotional services and commercial value.

The $5,000 will ordinarily constitute taxable income.

What If the Athlete Gets Free Products Instead of Money?

This is where NIL taxation becomes particularly interesting.

A business might tell an athlete:

“We aren't paying you. We're just giving you free merchandise.”

Unfortunately, replacing money with merchandise does not necessarily eliminate the income.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2(d)(1) provides:

“if services are paid for in property, the fair market value of the property taken in payment must be included in income as compensation.”

That is an extraordinarily broad rule.

Suppose an athlete agrees to promote a clothing company and receives $3,000 worth of clothing instead of cash.

The absence of a check does not necessarily mean there is no income.

If the clothing constitutes compensation for the athlete's services, its fair market value can constitute taxable compensation.

The same basic issue can arise when an athlete receives:

• shoes;

• electronics;

• jewelry;

• meals;

• travel;

• gift cards;

• free professional services; or

• other valuable property or benefits.

The IRS specifically identifies noncash NIL compensation—including merchandise, gift cards, and services—as potentially taxable income.

Even Free Services Can Be Taxable

The Treasury Regulations go even further.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2(d)(1) states that when services are exchanged for other services:

“the fair market value of such other services taken in payment must be included in income as compensation.”

Consider an athlete who agrees to promote a photographer's business in exchange for a professional photography package that would ordinarily cost $1,500.

No cash changes hands.

That does not necessarily mean nothing happened for federal tax purposes.

The athlete received $1,500 worth of services in exchange for promotional services. The fair market value of what the athlete received may therefore constitute income.

This is essentially a form of barter compensation.

What Is Fair Market Value?

Noncash compensation creates an obvious practical question: how much income must be reported?

Generally, the relevant concept is fair market value.

Fair market value ordinarily means the amount at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and willing seller when neither is compelled to participate and both understand the relevant facts.

Suppose an athlete receives sneakers that the manufacturer describes as being worth $800, but the same shoes normally sell to the public for $300.

The tax question is not necessarily resolved simply because someone printed an $800 number on a promotional document.

The relevant inquiry is the property's actual fair market value.

Athletes receiving substantial noncash compensation should therefore keep records showing what they received and how its value was determined.

NIL Income May Also Be Self-Employment Income

Income tax may not be the athlete's only concern.

Many NIL arrangements resemble independent business activity rather than traditional employment.

IRC § 1402 generally defines net earnings from self-employment by reference to gross income derived from a trade or business, reduced by allowable deductions attributable to that business.

Treasury Regulation § 1.1402(c)-1 similarly provides:

“In order for an individual to have net earnings from self-employment, he must carry on a trade or business.”

The regulation further explains that whether an individual is carrying on a trade or business can depend upon “all of the facts and circumstances in the particular case.”

This matters because an athlete who regularly negotiates sponsorships, makes paid appearances, produces promotional content, and performs endorsement services may be conducting a business.

If the activity produces net earnings from self-employment, the athlete may face self-employment tax in addition to ordinary federal income tax.

That can surprise someone who receives a $10,000 NIL payment and assumes that $10,000 is simply money available to spend.

Why NIL Taxes Can Surprise College Athletes

Traditional employees generally have federal income taxes and employment taxes withheld from their paychecks.

An independent contractor usually does not.

Suppose a business pays a student-athlete $20,000 for a series of appearances and social-media promotions.

The business may pay the athlete the entire $20,000.

Receiving the full amount can create the impression that the athlete has earned $20,000 after taxes.

But the absence of withholding does not make the tax disappear.

The athlete may later need to pay federal income tax and self-employment tax associated with the NIL activity.

Depending upon the amount of income involved and the athlete's overall circumstances, estimated tax payments may also become necessary during the year.

Can NIL Athletes Deduct Business Expenses?

Potentially.

If an athlete is legitimately carrying on an NIL trade or business, ordinary and necessary expenses attributable to that business may potentially be deductible under IRC § 162, subject to the numerous limitations elsewhere in the Internal Revenue Code.

Possible examples could include qualifying expenses for:

• professional accounting;

• legal services;

• business management;

• advertising;

• certain business travel;

• website expenses;

• business-related software; or

• other ordinary and necessary costs of conducting the NIL business.

But simply labeling an expenditure “NIL” does not make it deductible.

Personal expenses remain personal expenses.

An athlete cannot ordinarily convert clothing, meals, vacations, automobiles, or other personal consumption into deductible business expenses merely by claiming that maintaining a certain lifestyle helps build a personal brand.

The usual business-expense rules still apply.

What About Scholarships?

NIL income should not automatically be confused with scholarship income.

IRC § 117 contains a separate exclusion for certain qualified scholarships received by qualifying students, subject to statutory requirements and limitations.

An athletic scholarship used for qualifying educational expenses therefore presents a fundamentally different tax question from $5,000 paid by a restaurant for an athlete to appear in an advertisement.

One payment may exist because the recipient is receiving educational assistance.

The other exists because the recipient provided something of commercial value.

Calling compensation a “scholarship,” “gift,” “support payment,” or “NIL opportunity” does not necessarily determine its federal tax treatment.

Tax law generally looks to the substance of the transaction.

Are NIL “Gifts” Really Gifts?

This distinction can become especially important when businesses or NIL collectives describe benefits as gifts.

IRC § 102 generally excludes genuine gifts from the recipient's gross income.

But compensation does not become a tax-free gift merely because the payer uses generous terminology.

If a car dealer gives an athlete $10,000 because the athlete agrees to promote the dealership, there is an obvious exchange of economic value.

The athlete provided promotional services.

The dealership provided money.

That is fundamentally different from a parent giving a child $10,000 out of affection or generosity without expecting services in return.

NIL participants should therefore be cautious about assuming that something called a “gift” is necessarily a gift for federal income tax purposes.

What If the Athlete Never Receives a Tax Form?

Another common tax misconception is that income is taxable only when someone receives a Form W-2 or Form 1099.

That is incorrect.

Federal income tax liability generally depends upon the nature of the income—not merely upon whether the payer properly issued an information return.

If an athlete receives $8,000 of taxable compensation but never receives a tax form, the absence of paperwork does not ordinarily transform the $8,000 into tax-free income.

Taxpayers are responsible for reporting taxable income even when an information return is missing.

Keep Records of NIL Deals

Recordkeeping becomes particularly important when an athlete has several small sponsorships rather than one enormous contract.

An athlete may receive:

• $2,000 from a local restaurant;

• $750 for an autograph event;

• $1,500 in merchandise;

• $3,000 from sponsored social-media posts;

• free services worth $500; and

• several smaller promotional payments.

Individually, the transactions may not feel like a substantial business.

Collectively, however, they can produce meaningful taxable income.

Athletes engaged in NIL activity should consider maintaining records showing:

1. payments received;

2. noncash property or services received;

3. the fair market value of noncash compensation;

4. contracts and sponsorship agreements;

5. legitimate business expenses; and

6. any Forms 1099 or other tax documents received.

A separate bank account for substantial NIL activity may also make recordkeeping considerably easier, even when a separate account is not legally required.

NIL Has Turned Some Students Into Small-Business Owners

One of the most interesting consequences of NIL compensation is that a college athlete may effectively become a small-business owner while still attending school.

A student might suddenly have contracts, advertising income, deductible expenses, estimated tax obligations, information returns, recordkeeping requirements, and self-employment tax.

The dollar amounts do not have to reach professional-athlete levels before those tax rules matter.

Even relatively modest local endorsements can create federal tax consequences.

The Bottom Line

NIL income is generally taxable.

Cash payments are the most obvious example, but federal tax law reaches considerably further.

Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2 makes clear that compensation can include property and even services received in exchange for services. An athlete who receives merchandise, gift cards, free services, or other valuable benefits as part of an NIL arrangement therefore may have taxable income even when little or no cash changes hands.

And when an athlete's NIL activities rise to the level of carrying on a trade or business, the income may also produce self-employment tax consequences.

The central lesson is simple:

“I didn't get a paycheck” does not mean “I didn't receive taxable income.”

As NIL compensation becomes an increasingly ordinary part of college athletics, student-athletes and their families should treat endorsement and promotional activity as a genuine financial activity—not merely as free merchandise or spending money.

For athletes earning substantial amounts, getting tax advice early can be considerably easier than discovering the tax consequences after the money has already been spent.

Address

2261 Northpark Drive, # 416
Houston, TX
77339

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 8pm
Tuesday 8am - 8pm
Wednesday 8am - 8pm
Thursday 8am - 8pm
Friday 8am - 8pm
Sunday 8am - 8pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Dino Tax Co posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Dino Tax Co:

Shortcuts

Share

Category