04/13/2022
Earlier this week was Mama’s birthday, April 4.
She wanted me to attend a prestigious college, and I did, but the University of Georgia wasn’t her first choice. Last month, though, I jumped on a conference call with Ken French, Ph.D. His Dartmouth college bio credits him as an expert in investment strategies.
So here’s your birthday present; I finally made an Ivy League lecture.
Listening to French, the figurative light bulb went off. Instead of measuring risk as the potential for losses or volatility, it is more accurate to look at risk as the uncertainty about lifetime consumption.
It makes perfect sense; start with goals and work backward to the portfolio. Then, adjust the portfolio for returns and other sources of future income. At my age, it’s nice to get an 'aha' moment.
While the average dollar invested holds the global market of stocks, bonds and other assets, investors weigh their individual shares differently and for a good reason. For example, as a U.S. resident, it’s logical for me to overweight dollar-denominated assets. Age, risk aversion and future income sources also affect how an individual portfolio may deviate from the global market.
Chance dominates returns. Humans are hard-wired to look for patterns, but this evolutionary trait bodes poorly for investors. Being an academic, French pointed out that in the investing world 'a non-trivial fraction of the patterns are false positives.' Since Dartmouth sent me a rejection letter, a plebian observation is don’t confuse luck with brains.
Mama’s dad, Granddaddy Joe, bought a single stock, Coca-Cola, correctly pronounced 'KO koluh.' A banker named Pat Munroe encouraged him to plow some profit from his farm into Coco-Cola shares.
For the last half of the 20th century, Coca-Cola beat the S& P 500 but hasn’t over the last two decades. So it’s dangerous to believe current high-flying stocks will be able to maintain their outperformance.
Active investment doesn’t work; full stop. Since active management has higher fees, that drag dooms active management over time. In addition to higher transaction costs compared with a passive portfolio, investors in actively managed portfolios pay higher management fees. Investing actively can trigger greater tax consequences, too.
Active management often means overweighting a higher allocation of a particular individual stock. Because there’s a seller for every buyer, some party underweighted that stock. One team wins, and the other loses, but both pay to play.
Finally, most people benefit from diversification. Yes, some people like Warren Buffett can benefit from concentrated positions. But, more than likely, you aren’t as sharp as Buffett or have a partner as shrewd as Buffett’s right-hand man, Charlie Munger. Importantly, diversification reduces uncertainty about lifetime consumption.
French’s presentation resonated with me. Start with your spending goals, then build your portfolio to eliminate as much lifetime consumption uncertainty as practical. Understand the limitations of chance along with the folly of active management. Diversification may not be a free lunch, but it’s close enough.
Happy birthday, Mama. You tried to raise me better, I know.
You can’t always get what you want, but Buz Livingston, CFP, can help you figure out what you need. For specific advice, visit livingstonfinancial.net or drop by 2050 W. County Highway 30A, M1 Suite