08/21/2026
As some of y’all know, a major part of my job is succession planning in agriculture. I wanted to share one principle that more families need to take seriously when creating their estate and legacy plans.
Equalization, and the difference between equal and fair.
Take an anonymized planning situation I recently encountered. The details have been changed, but the problem is very real.
The family owns a farm worth several million dollars, along with meaningful liquid assets. On paper, it looks like they have everything figured out. Except there are multiple children, and only one wants to farm.
The common answer is to divide the operation equally and have the farming child buy out the others.
For simple math, imagine a $6 million farm divided among three children. Each receives a $2 million interest, leaving the farming child needing to find $4 million to buy out the siblings.
Here’s the problem. The farm may be worth $6 million, but it isn’t producing anywhere near enough income to support $4 million of additional debt. So how exactly is that child supposed to buy out everyone else without bankrupting themselves before they even get started?
That is where estate equalization comes in.
Attorneys handle the trusts, entities, and legal documents. The financial principle is making sure enough liquidity and structure exist so the nonfarming heirs can receive fair value without forcing the successor to mortgage or sell the operation.
That liquidity could come from existing assets, life insurance, structured purchase terms, or some combination of all three.
Equal and fair are not always the same thing.
A plan that preserves the land but destroys the family is not a successful succession plan. My job is to help families avoid that outcome before the transfer ever happens.
P.S., enjoy the picture of cotton back home. Yes, the bootheel is THAT flat.