13/01/2026
Why Zambia’s Use of the Yuan in the Mining Sector Makes Economic Sense
Zambia’s decision to allow the use of the Chinese yuan in the mining sector, particularly for the payment of taxes and royalties, has sparked debate. While some view the move with caution, it deserves a sober and pragmatic assessment rooted in Zambia’s current economic realities rather than ideological attachment to traditional currency systems.
At its core, this policy is not radical. It is adaptive.
China is one of Zambia’s largest trading partners and a dominant player in the mining sector. A significant share of Zambia’s copper exports ends up in China, and many mining companies operating locally earn revenue directly in yuan. Insisting that such companies convert earnings first into US dollars before settling tax obligations introduces unnecessary costs, inefficiencies, and foreign exchange pressures. Allowing tax payments in yuan simply aligns Zambia’s fiscal system with the structure of its trade.
Moreover, Chinese banks already operate within Zambia’s financial system. These institutions naturally hold yuan liquidity and facilitate transactions for Chinese-owned firms and suppliers. Permitting the use of the yuan for tax payments leverages existing financial infrastructure rather than creating new systems from scratch. The result is a smoother flow of funds, lower transaction costs, and reduced demand for scarce US dollars.
One of the most compelling advantages of this policy is its potential to reduce capital flight. When tax obligations are settled offshore or routed through multiple foreign currencies, significant value often bypasses the local economy entirely. By collecting taxes through domestic channels—even in a foreign currency—the Zambian state retains greater oversight, control, and traceability of mining revenues. This improves fiscal discipline and helps ensure that mining wealth contributes more directly to national development.
There is also a strategic macroeconomic dimension. Zambia, like many developing economies, has felt the strain of dollar shortages, exchange rate volatility, and external debt obligations denominated in foreign currencies. Diversifying the currencies used in trade and tax collection is a cautious step toward reducing over-dependence on the US dollar. Importantly, this is not a rejection of the dollar but a form of currency risk management.
That said, the policy is not without risks. Over-concentration on a single trading partner or currency can create vulnerabilities if economic or geopolitical conditions change. The Chinese yuan is also more tightly managed than freely floating currencies, which places a greater responsibility on the Bank of Zambia to manage reserves prudently and transparently. Currency diversification must therefore remain broad, balanced, and strategic.
Ultimately, the success of this policy should not be judged by the currency used, but by outcomes. Does it improve tax compliance? Does it increase government revenue? Does it strengthen the kwacha, create jobs, and support public services? If the answer to these questions is yes, then the policy is serving the national interest.
Zambia’s economic future will depend on pragmatic decisions that reflect global shifts while safeguarding national sovereignty. Allowing the yuan in the mining tax system is one such decision—measured, realistic, and potentially beneficial if implemented with strong governance and oversight.
In an evolving global economy, flexibility is not weakness. It is wisdom.
Makhaza Kabandama
